I have been reflecting on the tools that have come about in recent years to allow people to express themselves to anyone. Sites such as this, video broadcasting sites like YouTube and even (gag) Myspace have opened a medium for people to communicate with a worldwide audience.
The thing that has always fascinated me is the story that people have to tell. Everyone has a story of some kind, usually interesting and touching in some way. These types of places have allowed anyone to express their thoughts, take action, and communicate with others on a global scale. I know, it sounds cheesy, but if you sit back and marvel at the technology and what it means to our world, it truly is amazing.
It was not that long ago that e-mail was a thing of only the fortunate or truly geeky. Now, anyone can have an e-mail address, the internet is avaialble just about everywhere, and to become a worldwide author is possible in a matter of minutes. This ease of use has created most of the white noise that is Myspace, but in my world, everyone gets a shot. The empowerment of people is important, regardless of the vehicle, I suppose.
While I am one who could build a system like Blogger to express my thoughts, I would be distracted by the tweaking of the system itself, and the expression of my thoughts would be secondary. It's a weakness that I have. While you probably think that my thoughts are a waste of perfectly good bytes, it has proven to be therapeutic and stimulating of my creativity. This little space has proved useful beyond belief, and I only hope that you enjoy reading it. As some of these projects that I am working on come closer to implementation, I will gladly share them in the hopes that they benefit others.
I've said it before, but never lose the wonder of the technology that surrounds us. The tools we have today are empowering unlike anything in our history. Enjoy them. Use them. Most of all, thank you to those who build, maintain and enhance these tools. You are the enablers of potential.
Saturday, September 30, 2006
Friday, September 29, 2006
Attitudes
At the company I work, technology issues seem to take on a adversarial tone at just about every turn. It is frustrating beyond belief and only serves to make relationships difficult and an environment where you are constantly fighting the system, just to get something you want. I happen to be one of the few technical people that does not work on the technical side of the house, so I have a unique perspective. I can figure out how to ask for help in a way that will actually yield help.
What I find insane are some of the policies and the processes that you have to endure just to solve minor problems. I understand the need for consistency and access controls, but it should be tempered with reason. I have made the suggestion that those of us who are technical and able to support ourselves should be able to do so, with appropriate access given as needed.
It is frustrating for me to have to request something that I could fix myself in under ten minutes, which will take anywhere from a few hours to a few weeks to resolve. We are not talking about complex issues, I mean basic things like allocating more server space or installing software.
I am constantly explaining why policies are put into place to fellow coworkers who are blindsided by corporate IT policy, because the attitude from the IT community is just "because we said so." Unfortunately, that only angers everyone who hears it. Once you explain, in a reasonable, though usually non-technical manner, why security policies exist, most people agree that they are appropriate. The assumption that IT seems to make is that all people are morons and incapable of understanding anything about why they do the things they do. And while this may very well be the case most of the time, it is not absolute. Explained correctly, even the most complex technical issues can be grasped by just about anyone.
I strive to do this in everything I do, explain it in a way that everyone can understand. I do not feel it is necessary to talk down to people, rather it is more advantageous to increase their knowledge, sometimes without them even realizing it. Of course, I guess speaking to fellow employees as intelligent people who can think and reason for themself has succeeded officially in getting dinged on a review for not "considering my audience." Oh well, the people I work with have always expressed appreciation for explaining technical issues in a way they can comprehend, so my work is rewarding, at least in that regard.
So if you are a technical person, keep this in mind: Just because someone is non-technical, this does not mean that they cannot understand technical issues. You just have to speak their language and not intimidate them. Try it sometime, educating people is always for the greater good!
Oh yeah, and as much as RTFM is tempting as an answer, sometimes you have to point out the chapter and recommend some prerequisites. :-)
What I find insane are some of the policies and the processes that you have to endure just to solve minor problems. I understand the need for consistency and access controls, but it should be tempered with reason. I have made the suggestion that those of us who are technical and able to support ourselves should be able to do so, with appropriate access given as needed.
It is frustrating for me to have to request something that I could fix myself in under ten minutes, which will take anywhere from a few hours to a few weeks to resolve. We are not talking about complex issues, I mean basic things like allocating more server space or installing software.
I am constantly explaining why policies are put into place to fellow coworkers who are blindsided by corporate IT policy, because the attitude from the IT community is just "because we said so." Unfortunately, that only angers everyone who hears it. Once you explain, in a reasonable, though usually non-technical manner, why security policies exist, most people agree that they are appropriate. The assumption that IT seems to make is that all people are morons and incapable of understanding anything about why they do the things they do. And while this may very well be the case most of the time, it is not absolute. Explained correctly, even the most complex technical issues can be grasped by just about anyone.
I strive to do this in everything I do, explain it in a way that everyone can understand. I do not feel it is necessary to talk down to people, rather it is more advantageous to increase their knowledge, sometimes without them even realizing it. Of course, I guess speaking to fellow employees as intelligent people who can think and reason for themself has succeeded officially in getting dinged on a review for not "considering my audience." Oh well, the people I work with have always expressed appreciation for explaining technical issues in a way they can comprehend, so my work is rewarding, at least in that regard.
So if you are a technical person, keep this in mind: Just because someone is non-technical, this does not mean that they cannot understand technical issues. You just have to speak their language and not intimidate them. Try it sometime, educating people is always for the greater good!
Oh yeah, and as much as RTFM is tempting as an answer, sometimes you have to point out the chapter and recommend some prerequisites. :-)
Wednesday, September 27, 2006
Part of the Problem
It's one of those days when the realization of something hits you square in the face, and it's difficult to concentrate on much more. I know I'm not the only one who gets a reality beat down from time to time, but it still is a difficult item to work through sometimes.
I realize I'm not the only one that gets disgusted with my job, the politics involved and just the utter pointlessness of it all. There just comes a point when you realize that you are not living up to your potential and it really makes you mad. Not really mad at your job, per se, but mad at yourself for settling for less. This is probably the moment when great things happen, when people are inspired to do great things and they take action to change their life forever. However, I am not so disillusioned as to believe it happens like it does in a movie. In the movies, when people have this realization, they get up from their job and walk out to change the world, Jerry Maguire style. In the real world, however, acting like that would probably get you arrested. In the real world, this moment happens in silence and you start to think about your escape. The actual escape may come weeks or months down the road. The point is, the mind has been stimulated and has a purpose.
My realization has not come all at once, but over the course of the past few weeks, in several tiny signs. Life seems to present your contradictions to you in various, subtle ways. I have noticed that many people seem to miss these clues, plodding on through their lives without noticing the opportunities or improvements that can be utilized by learning from your own example. The person who toils away as an insurance salesman, all the while complaining bitterly about the state of the insurance industry is missing an important opportunity to change his or her situation. The problem is that you feel trapped, the idea of something better has long since been removed and replaced with an acceptance of their situation as the best one available. Shortly thereafter, a sense of hoplessness sets in, and you forget how bad it sucks.
I have been in a similar situation for the past few months, finally able to confront the reality of the situation at hand. While your imagination can justify just about anything, finding rationale for your continued unhappiness, the glaring contradiction will, at some point, smack you right between the eyes. So consider this my "virtual" Jerry Maguire moment, clutching my briefcase and walking out of the office to change the system, giving a speech to a stunned audience. Only, I'm not really walking out of the office and I don't own a briefcase and people don't think I've lost my mind. In my imagination though, that's happening. And that's a good start. :-)
I realize I'm not the only one that gets disgusted with my job, the politics involved and just the utter pointlessness of it all. There just comes a point when you realize that you are not living up to your potential and it really makes you mad. Not really mad at your job, per se, but mad at yourself for settling for less. This is probably the moment when great things happen, when people are inspired to do great things and they take action to change their life forever. However, I am not so disillusioned as to believe it happens like it does in a movie. In the movies, when people have this realization, they get up from their job and walk out to change the world, Jerry Maguire style. In the real world, however, acting like that would probably get you arrested. In the real world, this moment happens in silence and you start to think about your escape. The actual escape may come weeks or months down the road. The point is, the mind has been stimulated and has a purpose.
My realization has not come all at once, but over the course of the past few weeks, in several tiny signs. Life seems to present your contradictions to you in various, subtle ways. I have noticed that many people seem to miss these clues, plodding on through their lives without noticing the opportunities or improvements that can be utilized by learning from your own example. The person who toils away as an insurance salesman, all the while complaining bitterly about the state of the insurance industry is missing an important opportunity to change his or her situation. The problem is that you feel trapped, the idea of something better has long since been removed and replaced with an acceptance of their situation as the best one available. Shortly thereafter, a sense of hoplessness sets in, and you forget how bad it sucks.
I have been in a similar situation for the past few months, finally able to confront the reality of the situation at hand. While your imagination can justify just about anything, finding rationale for your continued unhappiness, the glaring contradiction will, at some point, smack you right between the eyes. So consider this my "virtual" Jerry Maguire moment, clutching my briefcase and walking out of the office to change the system, giving a speech to a stunned audience. Only, I'm not really walking out of the office and I don't own a briefcase and people don't think I've lost my mind. In my imagination though, that's happening. And that's a good start. :-)
Tuesday, September 26, 2006
A Rant About Credit
Our nations' preoccupation with credit file is amazing. I cannot make it through a single day without at least one sales pitch for credit. I cannot read a newspaper without dozens of them. There are stories and ads everywhere: build your credit, fix your credit, what your credit says about you, why credit matters, credit, credit, credit. It's really amazing. Then the institutions who throw money around at anyone who asks are amazed when people wake up hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt and cannot ever pay it back. Then they buy a few laws that favor them and weaken the one safety net that consumers have left, forcing them to be forever in debt to a multibillion dollar bank for their $575 Visa bill. God Bless America.
Something I have never been able to understand is how my credit rating can affect my auto insurance premium. My credit is about as relevant to my driving ability as my library record. You pay a premium in advance, the insurance is not loaning you any money. I just don't get it. There must be statistics that show people with poor credit have more accidents or something. I guess they're so preoccupied with their bills that they cannot focus on driving or something. If someone can explain it to me, please do. Insurance companies are the ones with the history of finding ways NOT to pay claims.
I just think this using credit is out of control and seems to be spreading into more and more of our lives. Need a job, get a credit check first. What the hell? If anything, the employee should do a credit check on the employer! They are the ones trusting the employer will pay them when their work is complete. I can maybe see the logic behind using it for telephones, because you could charge a huge phone bill and skip out, but a sufficient deposit would discourage that behavior for those of us whose lives don't revolve around our credit score.
Whether it's a credit file or some other database, our lives are becoming governed more and more by those databases that aggregate all of our personal data. There is so much more to a person than their data, and it seems like we are losing sight of that. People have rough times in their life, people have good times. Sometimes your situation can change in a heartbeat, through your own fault or through no fault of your own. This memory of every event of our lives is scary to me. Think about your life now, how it could change; a layoff, a huge medical bill, an accident could forever change your way of life. To be punished for this forever because you fell behind on your payment to Wells Fargo seems absurd.
We, as the people who fill their databases with our lives, have no power over that information. It exists forever, a journal of your life that makes your high school "permanent record" seem trivial. All the while, they get rich by providing this data to anyone willing to pay. It's a lousy system, and one that needs to be changed. I believe it should all be opt-in. If I want or need a credit file, I ask for one. If I don't leave my data alone. When someone uses this information, I am due a royalty. Hey, I can dream.
Something I have never been able to understand is how my credit rating can affect my auto insurance premium. My credit is about as relevant to my driving ability as my library record. You pay a premium in advance, the insurance is not loaning you any money. I just don't get it. There must be statistics that show people with poor credit have more accidents or something. I guess they're so preoccupied with their bills that they cannot focus on driving or something. If someone can explain it to me, please do. Insurance companies are the ones with the history of finding ways NOT to pay claims.
I just think this using credit is out of control and seems to be spreading into more and more of our lives. Need a job, get a credit check first. What the hell? If anything, the employee should do a credit check on the employer! They are the ones trusting the employer will pay them when their work is complete. I can maybe see the logic behind using it for telephones, because you could charge a huge phone bill and skip out, but a sufficient deposit would discourage that behavior for those of us whose lives don't revolve around our credit score.
Whether it's a credit file or some other database, our lives are becoming governed more and more by those databases that aggregate all of our personal data. There is so much more to a person than their data, and it seems like we are losing sight of that. People have rough times in their life, people have good times. Sometimes your situation can change in a heartbeat, through your own fault or through no fault of your own. This memory of every event of our lives is scary to me. Think about your life now, how it could change; a layoff, a huge medical bill, an accident could forever change your way of life. To be punished for this forever because you fell behind on your payment to Wells Fargo seems absurd.
We, as the people who fill their databases with our lives, have no power over that information. It exists forever, a journal of your life that makes your high school "permanent record" seem trivial. All the while, they get rich by providing this data to anyone willing to pay. It's a lousy system, and one that needs to be changed. I believe it should all be opt-in. If I want or need a credit file, I ask for one. If I don't leave my data alone. When someone uses this information, I am due a royalty. Hey, I can dream.
Monday, September 25, 2006
The Folly of Downloading Music
I have been thinking a lot lately about all of the issues that come from using the Internet on a regular basis. For the uninformed, it can be a scammer's dream on many fronts. I personally do not use peer-to-peer (p2p) services such as Limewire or any of the other file sharing networks. However, people that I know use them frequently. I was having a discussion with an friend the other day about downloading files from there and how a lot of them are just crapware that pretend to be songs. Those in the discussion were wondering how they would know the difference. So I was trying to explain that just because something says it's a song, doesn't mean it really is a song.
Recently, I worked on a computer of a family member who constantly used a file sharing program. One of the first things that I noticed was these "songs" that were less than 50k. I explained that this is just a trick to get people to download crapware that creates popups, zombifies (is that a word) the computer to spam and who knows what other kind of nastiness. So I was trying to explain that no song is going to be under 50k unless it's in a horrible quality and about five seconds, and finding what you want is likely going to be more difficult since these files seem to be everywhere. My advice was to ditch the p2p and just find a good alternate site for purchasing DRM free music from a legitimate source at a reasonable price. (They do exist, to start, click the Defective By Design link in the right column, or e-mail me for more information.)
The issue that I see with this is a lack of coherent information for the purchaser of a digital music player. I do not use the iPod, but it sounds like Apple has done a good job of making digital music management effortless. While some may argue with the proprietary nature of the format that they use, I would say that they have made the best effort I have observed. I use a rebranded version of the Creative player, and was provided some of the worst software on the planet for digital music management. For me, however, I understood audio formats and could laugh it off, downgrade the firmware and go on with life. (The firmware downgrade was necessary because that version of firmware will not work with Linux) But for the average consumer, they are stuck with substandard software to encode their music and the choices for purchasing music are limited. By default they are pushed to download the music they 1) can't legitimately buy online because it's not available, or 2) have bought and lost for one reason or another or 3) hear from their friends how to download music from p2p.
What they do not hear is how full of garbage much of the files on p2p are and that they can catch any number of illnesses from this content. Also, I do not know if sharing what you download is still turned on by default in these programs, but they could also find themself on the receiving end of a lawsuit and have no idea they were even sharing files. This opens another entirely different rant about how you can be punished more severely for downloading a song than drunk driving, but that's for another day.
I did a google search for various phrases that one might type in when trying to learn about digital file formats. I was presented with ad-laden web sites where the content was difficult to find and generic at best, technical specifications and not a whole lot in between. So at this point, expecting someone with little or no computer experience to make an educated decision about which type of file format is best for them seems difficult at best. I shall now add that to my list of projects -- providing information for those who are seeking information about digital music.
My advice to anyone reading this is not to download music from p2p. There are alternatives.
Recently, I worked on a computer of a family member who constantly used a file sharing program. One of the first things that I noticed was these "songs" that were less than 50k. I explained that this is just a trick to get people to download crapware that creates popups, zombifies (is that a word) the computer to spam and who knows what other kind of nastiness. So I was trying to explain that no song is going to be under 50k unless it's in a horrible quality and about five seconds, and finding what you want is likely going to be more difficult since these files seem to be everywhere. My advice was to ditch the p2p and just find a good alternate site for purchasing DRM free music from a legitimate source at a reasonable price. (They do exist, to start, click the Defective By Design link in the right column, or e-mail me for more information.)
The issue that I see with this is a lack of coherent information for the purchaser of a digital music player. I do not use the iPod, but it sounds like Apple has done a good job of making digital music management effortless. While some may argue with the proprietary nature of the format that they use, I would say that they have made the best effort I have observed. I use a rebranded version of the Creative player, and was provided some of the worst software on the planet for digital music management. For me, however, I understood audio formats and could laugh it off, downgrade the firmware and go on with life. (The firmware downgrade was necessary because that version of firmware will not work with Linux) But for the average consumer, they are stuck with substandard software to encode their music and the choices for purchasing music are limited. By default they are pushed to download the music they 1) can't legitimately buy online because it's not available, or 2) have bought and lost for one reason or another or 3) hear from their friends how to download music from p2p.
What they do not hear is how full of garbage much of the files on p2p are and that they can catch any number of illnesses from this content. Also, I do not know if sharing what you download is still turned on by default in these programs, but they could also find themself on the receiving end of a lawsuit and have no idea they were even sharing files. This opens another entirely different rant about how you can be punished more severely for downloading a song than drunk driving, but that's for another day.
I did a google search for various phrases that one might type in when trying to learn about digital file formats. I was presented with ad-laden web sites where the content was difficult to find and generic at best, technical specifications and not a whole lot in between. So at this point, expecting someone with little or no computer experience to make an educated decision about which type of file format is best for them seems difficult at best. I shall now add that to my list of projects -- providing information for those who are seeking information about digital music.
My advice to anyone reading this is not to download music from p2p. There are alternatives.
Thursday, September 21, 2006
Returning an Item
The other day I had to return an item to Kohl's, which is a department store in certain parts of the country. Mostly they sell clothing, but they also sell toys, kitchen appliances and other things of that nature.
The item I was attempting to return had been purchased on their web site approximately 30 days prior. They allow you to return online purchases to their "real" stores with no hassle, within 90 days or something like that. As far as retailers go, Kohl's is great for accepting returns and being reasonable in the first place, this just makes me like them more. The brick wall that the first person had was that the receipt that I had brought in was not the right one. Apparently, I should have brought in the packing slip, which had a receipt ID on it. This turned out to be more of a problem than I or the store manager could have dreamed.
On the sheet that I had, it had my order number, the itemized listing of all the purchases, the credit card confirmation number, and the price for each item. However, it turns out, they cannot issue a refund to the credit card without the receipt ID, which has a terminal ID and some other information on it, which is only printed on the packing slip. The absurdity of printing that one bit of information on only one of the numerous receipts you could obtain aside, I was shocked this information could not be obtained from the order number. So was the store manager.
The store manager was great, he was on the phone with his help desk, refusing to accept this explanation. Their first answer was that they could not look up a receipt ID using the order number. Then they tried to tell him they could not look in their system further than two weeks. He said that if I was able to log in and print it out, then that could not be correct and kept pressing them after every excuse they gave. This went on for nearly 30 minutes. Finally, five or six people and two supervisors later, he was able to get the information he needed to do a return.
I was impressed by his refusal to accept the perceived limitation of technology. So many people will not take the time to question what makes no sense and push back, especially when it comes to computers. I have received the answer of "the computers won't let us do it," or "my system doesn't work that way" too many times to count. Usually it is me telling them there probably is a way to do it and to escalate the problem to someone else who can figure it out. It was refreshing to not have to do this, and have someone in charge do it for me.
We had a great conversation as he was on hold. He was explaining his frustration with the fact that they had this system that could do just about anything imaginable, and that there just had to be a way. He did not believe he could not do this simple task, and making me wait two weeks for a check from the corporate office was stupid. If only all retailers were this technologically literate. This guy should be CEO, seriously.
When it was all finished, I wrote a nice comment on their web site. Whenever my expectations are exceeded or someone goes out of their way to help me, I believe in congratulating them. I know from experience that in retail, usually all you hear about are the problems. It is nice to get a thanks from a customer. When the customer goes through corporate, even better. Keep that in mind next time someone offers outstanding service. It only takes a minute and can make their day or week.
The item I was attempting to return had been purchased on their web site approximately 30 days prior. They allow you to return online purchases to their "real" stores with no hassle, within 90 days or something like that. As far as retailers go, Kohl's is great for accepting returns and being reasonable in the first place, this just makes me like them more. The brick wall that the first person had was that the receipt that I had brought in was not the right one. Apparently, I should have brought in the packing slip, which had a receipt ID on it. This turned out to be more of a problem than I or the store manager could have dreamed.
On the sheet that I had, it had my order number, the itemized listing of all the purchases, the credit card confirmation number, and the price for each item. However, it turns out, they cannot issue a refund to the credit card without the receipt ID, which has a terminal ID and some other information on it, which is only printed on the packing slip. The absurdity of printing that one bit of information on only one of the numerous receipts you could obtain aside, I was shocked this information could not be obtained from the order number. So was the store manager.
The store manager was great, he was on the phone with his help desk, refusing to accept this explanation. Their first answer was that they could not look up a receipt ID using the order number. Then they tried to tell him they could not look in their system further than two weeks. He said that if I was able to log in and print it out, then that could not be correct and kept pressing them after every excuse they gave. This went on for nearly 30 minutes. Finally, five or six people and two supervisors later, he was able to get the information he needed to do a return.
I was impressed by his refusal to accept the perceived limitation of technology. So many people will not take the time to question what makes no sense and push back, especially when it comes to computers. I have received the answer of "the computers won't let us do it," or "my system doesn't work that way" too many times to count. Usually it is me telling them there probably is a way to do it and to escalate the problem to someone else who can figure it out. It was refreshing to not have to do this, and have someone in charge do it for me.
We had a great conversation as he was on hold. He was explaining his frustration with the fact that they had this system that could do just about anything imaginable, and that there just had to be a way. He did not believe he could not do this simple task, and making me wait two weeks for a check from the corporate office was stupid. If only all retailers were this technologically literate. This guy should be CEO, seriously.
When it was all finished, I wrote a nice comment on their web site. Whenever my expectations are exceeded or someone goes out of their way to help me, I believe in congratulating them. I know from experience that in retail, usually all you hear about are the problems. It is nice to get a thanks from a customer. When the customer goes through corporate, even better. Keep that in mind next time someone offers outstanding service. It only takes a minute and can make their day or week.
Tuesday, September 19, 2006
Another Fun Banking Experience
So I had this issue with a bank I use that put a hold on a deposit in error. It has since been resolved quickly, so there's no need to complain bitterly about the bank. Though, on my list of complaint sources, banks are at the top of that list. Anyway, the clueless representative I spoke with on the phone said that there were no holds on cash if they are deposited. So my hacker brain starts to work...
When I went into the branch, the question was asked as to why they couldn't just cash the check for me and then I could fill out a deposit notice and deposit that cash, thereby being available immediately. The banker was surprised at this prospect (I can't believe I'm the first person to think of this) and said that they really were not allowed to do something like that. Note that he did not say it was impossible. So here is a simple solution, should should I have a "real" check I know is not going to bounce and need the funds to be available immediately: Cash the check at the branch of their bank close to my work, then deposit the cash on the way home.
On an related note, when I contacted the bank branch by telephone, they said they could not discuss account details over the phone because the line was not recorded, and that I would have to come in to discuss any issues with my account in person. I resisted the urge to ask if my conversation when I came in would be recorded because at that point my patience was dwindling. It will be a question for a future visit, though, believe me.
It is just these crazy policies that can be so easily circumvented drive me absolutely crazy. They seem to be everywhere. It is frustrating because they really do not serve any purpose other than to exercise power and some crazy sense of control. I can somewhat understand holds on checks, but payroll checks from a huge corporation that has been in business forever, come on already. Now most of their customers probably just grumble and accept that as just the way it is, but I am definitely not that customer.
When I went into the branch, the question was asked as to why they couldn't just cash the check for me and then I could fill out a deposit notice and deposit that cash, thereby being available immediately. The banker was surprised at this prospect (I can't believe I'm the first person to think of this) and said that they really were not allowed to do something like that. Note that he did not say it was impossible. So here is a simple solution, should should I have a "real" check I know is not going to bounce and need the funds to be available immediately: Cash the check at the branch of their bank close to my work, then deposit the cash on the way home.
On an related note, when I contacted the bank branch by telephone, they said they could not discuss account details over the phone because the line was not recorded, and that I would have to come in to discuss any issues with my account in person. I resisted the urge to ask if my conversation when I came in would be recorded because at that point my patience was dwindling. It will be a question for a future visit, though, believe me.
It is just these crazy policies that can be so easily circumvented drive me absolutely crazy. They seem to be everywhere. It is frustrating because they really do not serve any purpose other than to exercise power and some crazy sense of control. I can somewhat understand holds on checks, but payroll checks from a huge corporation that has been in business forever, come on already. Now most of their customers probably just grumble and accept that as just the way it is, but I am definitely not that customer.
Sunday, September 17, 2006
Windows Vista
So I happened upon a link that would allow me to download a preview release of Windows Vista, which running as I type this. I had to provide registration info for Microsoft, so who knows what kind of promotions I'll receive now. Since I do not use any Microsoft OS, I do not know how valuable that will be, but maybe someone I know can take advantage of it.
I have no intention of purposely buying Windows Vista, but I thought it would be a learning experience, and those are never bad. This is assuming that I have a computer powerful enough to run it. Good grief, the capabilities required for this are unbelievable.
I'm going to try to install it on an old laptop that I have. I seriously doubt it will be a fun experience, even if it will install, but it should still be an experience anyway. If you have the chance and are curious, I would suggest trying it out. The download is large, nearly 2.6 gb. But it's one time I can get something free from Microsoft, so you can't go wrong with it.
Here's the link. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/
I have no intention of purposely buying Windows Vista, but I thought it would be a learning experience, and those are never bad. This is assuming that I have a computer powerful enough to run it. Good grief, the capabilities required for this are unbelievable.
I'm going to try to install it on an old laptop that I have. I seriously doubt it will be a fun experience, even if it will install, but it should still be an experience anyway. If you have the chance and are curious, I would suggest trying it out. The download is large, nearly 2.6 gb. But it's one time I can get something free from Microsoft, so you can't go wrong with it.
Here's the link. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsvista/
Saturday, September 16, 2006
Owned By A Bank
There is not much that annoys me more than when business and government misuse the language to (usually) mean the exact opposite of what they are saying. I am usually wary of anything that starts out with "for your convenience..." or "for your protection..." because usually that means I'm about to get something that is neither for my convenience or protection.
An elderly relative recently had a charge for $12.99 appear on her bank statement. This is a person who lives on a fixed income, and whose account balance is usually under $1 by the end of the month. Luckily, the charge was caught before it caused her account to be overdrawn. She had no idea what this charge was for, so we called the 800 number listed on the statement.
It turns out, it was for "identity theft protection" which was endorsed by her bank. So I asked how she incurred this charge, and was informed that she would have filled out a form and returned to them. So I asked what type of form it would have been, thinking it was probably something that looked like a sweepstakes entry, free gift, or a rebate check. Oh no, they assured me, it was clear what it was and that if she did not cancel within 30 days, there would be a charge of $12.99 a month. She has no idea what she would have filled out and sent back, and they could only theorize the type of document it would have been. Since she lauged and asked why in the world she would need that, it obviously was not clear what it was.
My guess is that it was completely confusing and mislabeled. I know you have probably received an offer like this: "For your convenience, we have automatically enrolled you in our new [fill in the blank] service, ABSOLUTELY FREE!* To accept this offer, just verify your current address and you will be enrolled immediately!" Finally you are able to locate what the size 4-point asterisk points to on the back of a different sheet of paper, also written in 4-point type which at the end of a five paragraph exercise in legalese says that free does not really mean free.
From my experience, our older generation has no concept of this type of marketing. Logically, free meant free. Free now means free after trial, free after rebate, or free after [fill in the blank]. If a product is good enough to warrant buying it, you tell people about it and they purchase it. Seems straightforward enough. I do not know when we reached the point that you had to be tricked into buying something, while at the same time they say - with a straight face - that it was a perfectly clear offer. The fact of the matter is people do not fight this kind of crap. They accept these unethical practices and move on. Every time I am confronted with this kind of nonsense, I demand my money back and complain to the authorities if necessary.
Which leads me to a sub-rant: Technical processes aside, why is it that someone can charge your credit or debit card, deducting the money almost immediately, but to get a credit takes days or weeks? It is just one of those things that we have allowed to happen, not demanded that a credit happen as quickly as the original charge.
It seems so much of my time is spent just making the business that I deal with do what I am paying them to do. You could probably ask just about any person you know about an experience with phone companies, banks, insurance companies or these other entities which take our money and I would wager they have a horror story, if not several.
If you are one who just lets this happen without a fight, I encourage you to join those of us who complain and make a fuss. If enough people refused to accept this level of service, I really believe change would come. But now, if one company can get away with it, they all try. Fight back, find ways around the nonsense, and take control at every opportunity.
An elderly relative recently had a charge for $12.99 appear on her bank statement. This is a person who lives on a fixed income, and whose account balance is usually under $1 by the end of the month. Luckily, the charge was caught before it caused her account to be overdrawn. She had no idea what this charge was for, so we called the 800 number listed on the statement.
It turns out, it was for "identity theft protection" which was endorsed by her bank. So I asked how she incurred this charge, and was informed that she would have filled out a form and returned to them. So I asked what type of form it would have been, thinking it was probably something that looked like a sweepstakes entry, free gift, or a rebate check. Oh no, they assured me, it was clear what it was and that if she did not cancel within 30 days, there would be a charge of $12.99 a month. She has no idea what she would have filled out and sent back, and they could only theorize the type of document it would have been. Since she lauged and asked why in the world she would need that, it obviously was not clear what it was.
My guess is that it was completely confusing and mislabeled. I know you have probably received an offer like this: "For your convenience, we have automatically enrolled you in our new [fill in the blank] service, ABSOLUTELY FREE!* To accept this offer, just verify your current address and you will be enrolled immediately!" Finally you are able to locate what the size 4-point asterisk points to on the back of a different sheet of paper, also written in 4-point type which at the end of a five paragraph exercise in legalese says that free does not really mean free.
From my experience, our older generation has no concept of this type of marketing. Logically, free meant free. Free now means free after trial, free after rebate, or free after [fill in the blank]. If a product is good enough to warrant buying it, you tell people about it and they purchase it. Seems straightforward enough. I do not know when we reached the point that you had to be tricked into buying something, while at the same time they say - with a straight face - that it was a perfectly clear offer. The fact of the matter is people do not fight this kind of crap. They accept these unethical practices and move on. Every time I am confronted with this kind of nonsense, I demand my money back and complain to the authorities if necessary.
Which leads me to a sub-rant: Technical processes aside, why is it that someone can charge your credit or debit card, deducting the money almost immediately, but to get a credit takes days or weeks? It is just one of those things that we have allowed to happen, not demanded that a credit happen as quickly as the original charge.
It seems so much of my time is spent just making the business that I deal with do what I am paying them to do. You could probably ask just about any person you know about an experience with phone companies, banks, insurance companies or these other entities which take our money and I would wager they have a horror story, if not several.
If you are one who just lets this happen without a fight, I encourage you to join those of us who complain and make a fuss. If enough people refused to accept this level of service, I really believe change would come. But now, if one company can get away with it, they all try. Fight back, find ways around the nonsense, and take control at every opportunity.
Friday, September 15, 2006
VOIP Alternative - Jajah
A VOIP service that's a little different that I have been experimenting with is Jajah (www.jajah.com). This service is unique in that it is not a landline replacement type service. You simply put in your number and number of the person you are calling. Your phone rings, when you pick it up, the line rings to the other person. I've used the free trial and the voice quality is okay. It really depends on the time of day that you are using it, but overall I've been pleased. It's definitely worth a try.
Thursday, September 14, 2006
The VOIP Leap - Followup
Earlier I posted about making the switch to VOIP. Well, it has not worked out so well. Not because of technical reasons, but because of general hassle. I had selected to go with the same provider as before, Vonage. However, I had returned my VOIP unit from the previous experience to the retailer. Apparently, the special to come back only applies if you have the same unit.
Also, their special would only work if I activated new service, paid shipping for another unit and then called customer service to request a cancel of that shipment, and a credit of two months once my service was active. The biggest issue was that I know I was not talking to America, as much as "Mitch" tried to help. I kept getting disconnected, the voice quality sounded like a tin can and two strings, so finally I just gave up.
I returned the unit to the retailer and bought a phone card instead. So much for the leap. I figure all I need is one more hassle. If it's that difficult just to become a customer, who knows what will happen if I have a problem.
I may elect to go with another provider, so I may revisit this thread again.
Also, their special would only work if I activated new service, paid shipping for another unit and then called customer service to request a cancel of that shipment, and a credit of two months once my service was active. The biggest issue was that I know I was not talking to America, as much as "Mitch" tried to help. I kept getting disconnected, the voice quality sounded like a tin can and two strings, so finally I just gave up.
I returned the unit to the retailer and bought a phone card instead. So much for the leap. I figure all I need is one more hassle. If it's that difficult just to become a customer, who knows what will happen if I have a problem.
I may elect to go with another provider, so I may revisit this thread again.
Wednesday, September 13, 2006
What's Your Job
One of the most complicated things I have to explain to relatives and friends who are not computer geeks is my job function. I know that others probably encounter this same issue when someone asks, "So what do you do." Usually I repeat my title back to them, only to have the glaze over their eyes get thicker. I then try to reduce my job into as easy terms as possible. The conversation usually ends with them saying something about how it sounds too complicated for them.
The biggest hurdle in this, I think, is that when people know you work with computers in a role that administers them rather than simply uses them, they immediately think it's over their head. The fact of the matter is, there are a lot of computer jobs that require specialization in one particular area.
I used to work with someone who was a wizard troubleshooting issues with Unix print queues. She could solve anything. But she did not know how to uninstall a program in Windows and had no desire to apply herself to understand it better because she was a self-proclaimed non-geek. I have worked with others like this who can perform things I could only imagine, but they cannot figure out how to type an address directly into the address bar of their web browser. There seems to be this stigma about computers that baffles people, and I struggle to understand why people put up this wall around them when it comes to it.
And that's the thing; my jobs in the recent past have not been terribly complicated or technical. Most of them have been varying degrees of system administration or supporting roles. I pity those people who invent crazy stuff explaining their job at the Thanksgiving dinner table.
The biggest hurdle in this, I think, is that when people know you work with computers in a role that administers them rather than simply uses them, they immediately think it's over their head. The fact of the matter is, there are a lot of computer jobs that require specialization in one particular area.
I used to work with someone who was a wizard troubleshooting issues with Unix print queues. She could solve anything. But she did not know how to uninstall a program in Windows and had no desire to apply herself to understand it better because she was a self-proclaimed non-geek. I have worked with others like this who can perform things I could only imagine, but they cannot figure out how to type an address directly into the address bar of their web browser. There seems to be this stigma about computers that baffles people, and I struggle to understand why people put up this wall around them when it comes to it.
And that's the thing; my jobs in the recent past have not been terribly complicated or technical. Most of them have been varying degrees of system administration or supporting roles. I pity those people who invent crazy stuff explaining their job at the Thanksgiving dinner table.
Monday, September 11, 2006
09/11/2006
On the five year tragedy of September 11, most people have been talking about where they were on that day. Most of their stories are much more exciting than mine. I did not turn on the news that morning, so I did not know about the event that had taken place. I remember in the car on the way to work, the announcers kept saying what a tragedy had happened. I was wondering what was happening because they just kept saying what a tragedy it was. Finally, they said a plane had crashed into the World Trade Center in New York.
When I got to work, some of the other employees had managed to get the local news on the televisions in the cafeteria. Ordinarily they only showed company broadcasts, but everyone was too curious, I suppose. It's interesting to note that to this day, CNN is still broadcast on those televisions. There were several people gathered around, just wondering what had happened. Just as we all had decided it was an accident, we saw the second plane hit. It suddenly became clear that there was something else happening.
I went back to my desk and tried to get some information from the internet news pages, but all of the web sites were unavailable. Everything was overwhelmed, everyone else was thinking the same thing I was, apparently. Shortly after that, one of the head people said we could go home for the day if we wanted.
I did go home that day and spend it with my family, watching the events unfold. I was not scared that an attack would happen to us, but I was fearful for the people who were there, on the ground, watching in real life what we were seeing on television. The most shocking thing to me was that there were absolutely no airplanes in the air that night. We lived near a small regional airport and the flight path to the major aiport was over us, so there were always the sounds of planes in the air. The absence of that was disturbing.
So now five years later, we're in a perpetual state of war with a noun, we have ridiculous airport security, limited freedoms, increased government surveillance, prisoner torture, corporations getting rich from death and destruction, and a whole list of other issues too numerous to mention individually. I do not think that anyone could have estimated the degree to which the events of that day would be politicized for a fanatical agenda and the blind allegiance these people would receive by invoking the word "terrorist."
The fact is the world is a complicated place filled with a huge array of diverse beliefs and individuals. Few, if any, issues are black and white and rarely are there simple answers to the tough questions. The events of that day were not as simple as them hating our freedom. And one can wonder what drives these individuals to these acts, without being unpatriotic. Something makes them do this, and perhaps those are the issues that we should take a hard look at, instead of simply name calling and labeling them as lunatics. This does not excuse their actions in any way, but I have to believe there is common ground between everyone that can result in a peaceful coexistence.
It is not mandatory that we all get along, but, but we can at least agree to not kill each other. Maybe that's a dreamland, but I have to believe it is possible in our current day and age. But then again, there's not much money to be made from not killing each other.
When I got to work, some of the other employees had managed to get the local news on the televisions in the cafeteria. Ordinarily they only showed company broadcasts, but everyone was too curious, I suppose. It's interesting to note that to this day, CNN is still broadcast on those televisions. There were several people gathered around, just wondering what had happened. Just as we all had decided it was an accident, we saw the second plane hit. It suddenly became clear that there was something else happening.
I went back to my desk and tried to get some information from the internet news pages, but all of the web sites were unavailable. Everything was overwhelmed, everyone else was thinking the same thing I was, apparently. Shortly after that, one of the head people said we could go home for the day if we wanted.
I did go home that day and spend it with my family, watching the events unfold. I was not scared that an attack would happen to us, but I was fearful for the people who were there, on the ground, watching in real life what we were seeing on television. The most shocking thing to me was that there were absolutely no airplanes in the air that night. We lived near a small regional airport and the flight path to the major aiport was over us, so there were always the sounds of planes in the air. The absence of that was disturbing.
So now five years later, we're in a perpetual state of war with a noun, we have ridiculous airport security, limited freedoms, increased government surveillance, prisoner torture, corporations getting rich from death and destruction, and a whole list of other issues too numerous to mention individually. I do not think that anyone could have estimated the degree to which the events of that day would be politicized for a fanatical agenda and the blind allegiance these people would receive by invoking the word "terrorist."
The fact is the world is a complicated place filled with a huge array of diverse beliefs and individuals. Few, if any, issues are black and white and rarely are there simple answers to the tough questions. The events of that day were not as simple as them hating our freedom. And one can wonder what drives these individuals to these acts, without being unpatriotic. Something makes them do this, and perhaps those are the issues that we should take a hard look at, instead of simply name calling and labeling them as lunatics. This does not excuse their actions in any way, but I have to believe there is common ground between everyone that can result in a peaceful coexistence.
It is not mandatory that we all get along, but, but we can at least agree to not kill each other. Maybe that's a dreamland, but I have to believe it is possible in our current day and age. But then again, there's not much money to be made from not killing each other.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
